Please consider the implications of budget reconciliation proposals for the nearly 700,000 Louisianians, including over 200,000 children, who experience hunger in the Louisiana. Since the pandemic, food insecurity has continued to increase, reaching its highest levels since the economic downturn of 2008. While each person's experience is unique, people facing hunger have expressed common priorities: dignity and respect, access to healthy food to support a healthy life, and economic stability and mobility.

Strong investments in federal nutrition programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) help millions of people—including families with children, seniors and active-duty military members—become more food-secure. Cutting funding for these crucial programs will further harm families who are already navigating high costs of food and other essentials, while also hurting rural economies and agricultural producers who rely on a stable market. SNAP is one of the best investments our country makes in local communities. 

Cuts to nutrition programs will also cause strain to the Feeding Louisiana partner food banks and other food partners. While food banks are working hard to keep their shelves stocked for their neighbors, they cannot absorb the large increase in demand that the proposed cuts will create. Many are already struggling to meet sustained and heightened needs in their communities because of higher food prices and fewer resources. 

If these proposals move forward, they could also risk further delaying the passage of a bipartisan farm bill. Congress has entrusted this effort to the House and Senate agriculture committees, and they have been working hard to develop a bill that supports families facing hunger, U.S. farmers and producers, and our nation’s charitable food system. We urge Congress to reject spending cuts to nutrition programs in the budget reconciliation process that would hinder their work in ensuring America has the food it needs to thrive.